If these other tests are CPU-only, that could skew the results towards the Mac M1. It remained competitive when emulating x86 in the Handbrake 1.1.0 benchmark: Note: It isn't clear if Handbrake 1.4.0 uses GPU acceleration by default on the M1 or not. PCMag found that it particularly excels in Handbrake 1.4.0 beta, outperforming any Intel-based system in that application. While different sites ran different benchmarks, the conclusions they reach are broadly similar: The M1 is an impressive CPU. Clearly, some laptops give that CPU more breathing room than others, and the difference is material. In multi-threaded code, things improve slightly, though I'd note that the performance Anandtech logs for the 4800U, at 9286, is quite a bit higher than what I've seen personally. The Intel 1165G7 - a Tiger Lake powered SoC - can tie things up with the M1. In native code, the M1 is as fast as anything in-market except for AMD's Ryzen 9 5950X. Note that the "990" score reported for the Mac Mini in our discussion of leaked CB23 results from this AM is an emulated score, not an apples-to-apples native score. Test likes Cinebench R23 show more nuance.
Nothing competes with it in ST or MT, and no other laptop or system in its TDP range really comes close. GeekBench 5, as anticipated, is a huge win for the M1. There are still enough tests available to make some broad comparisons. There's a dearth of benchmarks available for measuring M1 performance, so websites have run with what they've got. It does mean that this is a competitive threat Intel and AMD absolutely must take seriously, not just because of what it says about Apple, but because of what it says about x86's ability to compete against ARM, long-term. That doesn't mean it beats x86 in every single test, or that it's going to sweep Intel or AMD from the market. While some leaked benchmark results we wrote up earlier today tried to argue that the M1 wouldn't be a problem for Intel and AMD, the full review results available today from places such as our sister site PCMag (Opens in a new window), Ars Technica (Opens in a new window), and Anandtech (Opens in a new window) all say the same things: The M1 is a serious, serious contender for one of the all-time most efficient and highest-performing architectures we've ever seen deploy. The results collectively suggest that neither Intel nor AMD can afford to take any long vacations. After some leaked individual tests, publications are finally putting their own experiences and tests to paper. The new ARM core has been the subject of a great deal of speculation since Apple announced it would move away from Intel CPUs and towards its own designs. The first reviews and head-to-head comparisons of Apple's M1 are finally here.
0 kommentar(er)
